Main Menu

SMOLENSK

06-04-2016 21-50-35

Find on this homepage some of the extensive scientific work showing :

The plane was in free air space more than 40m above the ground , when it lost first the outmost 5.5m of the left wing followed by another loss of 4.5m 1.6 seconds later.

 

 

Interview with Danish Engineer Ms.Sc. Mech. Glenn Arthur Jørgensen, TV Republika.

Understand in a simple way, 10 reasons why the Smolensk crash could not happen like the Russians and previous Polish authorities claimed.

Find on this homepage some of the extensive scientific work mentioned in this interview showing :

The plane was in free air space more than 40m above the ground , when it lost first the outmost 5.5m of the left wing followed by another loss of 4.5m 1.6 seconds later.

Major Errors of the Official Russian and previous Polish Explaination

07-04-2016 00-30-32

The Last Seconds of Flight

06-04-2016 23-40-06

Trajectory from Top and Down by Black Box Data

07-04-2016 00-18-37

The previous Leader of the Polish Crash Investigation Team without Answers.

 

Large Aircraft Wing Impact with a Tree

06-04-2016 23-24-09

Wood Quality Assessment of Tree Trunk

06-04-2016 23-31-51

CFD Analysis of Wing Damage of the TU-154M

06-04-2016 22-18-32

Confirming CFD Analysis by Third Party

06-04-2016 23-53-59

Engineers View on How Smolensk Could Take Place

06-04-2016 23-45-20

Height of Plane by Three Independant Methods

07-04-2016 00-23-00

Fuel Jettison and Vegetation Damage

07-04-2016 00-03-32

See How Strong Fences are built in Russia.

 

Professor Binienda at Dublin University

 

Comparing GPS and Baro Corrected Data

Comparing_gps_and_baro_data 07-04-2016 15-31-06